3. Paradigms at war
Before we continue this journey on understanding how the mind works, it is useful to revise the spectacular clash between some social and biological sciences.
Scientists seem to be fortressed in either two sides. Very simply put:
1. Biologists think of the mind as the result of structured organs. The architecture and the function of these structures is controlled by genes, the so called selfish replicators. Thus, brain functions have been shaped by evolution.
2. Social scientists believe in that biology and genes have a limited role in human psychology. Culture and ethic issues exist as a complex human output that cannot be explained by evolution. For instance, altruism, art or religion.
Molecules versus politics. Poloboro believes that the former go out of their way to stretch their theory to phenomenon that the really cannot explain. The latter, as Pinker says "have the tendency to buy an off-the-shelf moral package that would spare us from having to argue moral issues at all".
Scientists seem to be fortressed in either two sides. Very simply put:
1. Biologists think of the mind as the result of structured organs. The architecture and the function of these structures is controlled by genes, the so called selfish replicators. Thus, brain functions have been shaped by evolution.
2. Social scientists believe in that biology and genes have a limited role in human psychology. Culture and ethic issues exist as a complex human output that cannot be explained by evolution. For instance, altruism, art or religion.
Molecules versus politics. Poloboro believes that the former go out of their way to stretch their theory to phenomenon that the really cannot explain. The latter, as Pinker says "have the tendency to buy an off-the-shelf moral package that would spare us from having to argue moral issues at all".
